Pay in installments of $7.43 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 28 - Aug 2
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
cube spd pedale Chromag Pilot BA SPD Pedals – Black Mountain BicyclesThe Pilot BA is the union of Chromag's extensive flat pedal design combined with a proven, dual sided SPD compatible cleat engagement system With a long, 110mm body, the pins reach beyond the cleat channel of most shoes to provide a secure 5 point pin contact between shoe and pedal Features an G. 3 high strength chromoly axle system, with a double seal, inner bushing, and outer cartridge bearing Compatible with all 2 bolt SPD cleats, 12 deg release
- The Pilot BA is the union of Chromag's extensive flat pedal design combined with a proven, dual sided SPD compatible cleat engagement system
- With a long, 110mm body, the pins reach beyond the cleat channel of most shoes to provide a secure 5-point pin contact between shoe and pedal
- Features an G.3 high-strength chromoly axle system, with a double seal, inner bushing, and outer cartridge bearing
- Compatible with all 2-bolt SPD cleats, 12 deg release angle
- 10 removable pins per pedal
- Platform: 105 x 110mm
- Weight 595g
| Model | Pilot BA, Pliot BA |
| Spindle | CrMo |
| Size | 9/16" |
| Body Material | Aluminum |
| Color | Black, Blue, Gold, Purple |
| Weight | 595g |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 7 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
I have a 1999 Toyota Sienna LE
The starter was an almost an exact fit. The only difference was the rubber cover for the ground screw. The original started has a slight different design. Easy fix was the remove the old one and replaced it on the new starter.
The fit was perfect. Used youtube video on starter replacement for my Sienna which was clear and east to follow. Took 2 hours to replace the starter.
Waited a few weeks to see ensure the starter was working before I posted a review. The starter sound strong as the engine kicks over. Looks to be working fine. The dealers would have wanted $600 to replace the started. Some online poster says these Amazon knockoff are cheap and won't work. It started and time will tell how long it last. Its a 25 year old car. If I get another year or two use out of it, I'm good.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 31, 2024
★★★★★ 1
Be careful.
Starter arrived broken.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Almost a perfect fit for 2002 Avalon
The only difference from the old starter to this one is the old hardware had notches for the electrical connection and the old starter had a longer terminal post so I couldn’t swap the hardware successfully.
Instead of returning it because I don’t want to walk to work again I decided to grind a notch on the new starter.
Lucky for me it worked and I don’t show up with my uniform sweaty in a retail job anymore
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 12, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Motor de arranque
Funciona genial
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Invonveniencia de reconstruir piezas como arranque, alternador.
Instalé este arranque en mi Camry 2002. Traerlo por Amazon a Caracas me costo la pieza y gastos de envío $112. Hace 8 meses se reconstruyó el arranque original con un costo de $180. Se dañó y decidí comprar uno en Amazon. Fue la mejor decisión.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 12, 2024